Press | Search | Contact Us | Login | Register | En Espanol

By: Ann Bouchoux   Date: 4/27/10

Did you know that research has shown no direct link between moderate consumption of sugars and serious disease or obesity?  Did you know studies have shown that there’s no discernable difference between the way HFCS and table sugar are metabolized in the body?

These days there are a lot of misconceptions about sugars and while just about anyone with even a mild interest in nutrition issues has an opinion on it and those opinions are often shared loudly and with conviction, they’re not always matched with facts.  New nutrition studies are being published almost every week, impacting how the subject is communicated to consumers, how public policy is determined, and how dietary guidance is formulated. 

To help put existing and new science together for health professionals and nutrition communicators, the International Food Information Council Foundation has released its latest IFIC Review on the The Science of Sugars with the latest consensus science, both pro and con, on everything from the controversy about whether substitution of high fructose corn syrup for sucrose has had an impact on health, to liquid versus solid calories; physical and mental performance; and current issues and research needs, just to name a few of the many topic areas in the publication.

You may be scratching your head saying to yourself, “but the IFIC Review: The Science of Sugars has been around for years.”  True enough—the original of this document was first published in 1995, and revisions have been published periodically over the years.  As more and more research is done on the topic, we’re committed to updating you on what it all means. 

If you are a dietitian, a dietetics or nutrition science professional, educator, or student, this science based document is a great resource on this often-controversial subject.  Various perspectives are discussed and cited with 172 references from peer reviewed journals and government agencies to provide both balance and context to the understanding of sugars in all its forms.

As sugar gets debated more and more at higher and higher levels of government, the science behind it becomes more important than ever.  When you want to get the facts, know what the research is showing, and how best to communicate this information, the IFIC Review: The Science of Sugars is your one-stop shop for consensus science.
 

Tags:

4 comment(s) so far...

Re: A Spoonful of Science on Sugar

Thanks for posting this reminder. There seems to be the necesity to find the food or food industry demon that causes all our problems. You can overeat anything and have problems. I have been working for more than 25 years trying to teach individuals what is in food and how to determine the nutrient composition they are striving for to optimize their health goals.

By Elsa Brisson on   Friday, April 30, 2010

Re: A Spoonful of Science on Sugar

Thanks for reminding individuals. We have to stop this food demons and all or nothing thinking that is creeping back. A sweet ending to a great meal is nice. Taking sugar out of the meal and beverages leaves more sugar for dessert!

By Elsa Brisson on   Friday, April 30, 2010

Re: A Spoonful of Science on Sugar



Thanks for posting this reminder. There seems to be the necesity to find the food or food industry demon that causes all our problems. You can overeat anything and have problems. I have been working for more than 25 years trying to teach individuals what is in food and how to determine the nutrient composition they are striving for to optimize their health goals.


By uggs outlet on   Monday, February 14, 2011

Re: A Spoonful of Science on Sugar

The IFIC Review: The Science of Sugars represents consensus in epidemiology only. Biochemical research by John Yudkin, Peter Kuo, Peter Havel, Richard J. Johnson, Miriam Vos, and others has elucidated the effects of excessive added sugars intake on various aspects of metabolic function. To be sure, fructose is not the only food component in the modern dietary that deranges the metabolism. Excessive omega-6 intake is also a major problem.

Interestingly, fructose in conjunction with high omega-6 intake induces non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in laboratory animals. However, when omega-6s are replaced by saturated fats with fructose intake held constant, NAFLD does not develop.

By David Brown on   Monday, February 14, 2011

Your name:
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment   Cancel 

All Blogs

Search Blog

Tag Cloud